Posts belonging to Category 'Amsterdam Sightseeing'

21 hours in Los Angeles (LAX)

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – This friday (9th of may) I’ll be flying into Los Angeles (LAX) from Sydney. I arrive at 11am local time and my flight to Amsterdam doesn’t leave till 8am the next day.. so I got 21 hours to kill. I have been reading the newsgroups and everybody recommends taking the Blue Bus to Santa Monica and do some shopping, walking and then do the 30 minute beachwalk to Venice. I could be interested in doing something similar next year. Can any locals say what the weather is likely to be in this area in early January? I know it’s not going to be hot, but what could I expect? santa monica historical averages for january 1: average high – 19

What to do in Europe in Februrary?

Question:

I am planing on being in Europe for two weeks in February.  Does anyone have recomendations on places to see?  I think I want to see Rome, Paris and Amsterdam.  Are there sites along the way I should  definately see of places I should totally avoid? Thanks

Response:

I am planing on being in Europe for two weeks in February.  Does anyone have recomendations on places to see?  I think I want to see Rome, Paris and Amsterdam.  Are there sites along the way I should  definately see of places I should totally avoid?

There’s lots to see in between but since you only have two weeks I would concentrate on those three cities. If you shop around you may be able to find cheap flights between them giving you, effectively, four days in each city — long enough to get a flavour of each place. Travelling by train may be more interesting and may be (though isn’t necessarily) cheaper, but on a two-week schedule will eat severely into your sightseeing time.

Response:

I am planing on being in Europe for two weeks in February.  Does anyone have recomendations on places to see?  I think I want to see Rome, Paris and Amsterdam.  Are there sites along the way I should  definately see of places I should totally avoid? Thanks

Paris could occupy all those two weeks:-) But if you’re pressed, you’d better see the Mona Lisa and all the other major things in the Louvre (give it 1 day and you’ll have seen 1/4 of it if you’re lucky) go up the Eiffel Tower if the queue’s not too long. (I went in Feb and it wasn’t). Then I recommend the underrated Musee de l’Homme, Notre Dame of course (and Shakespeare &co. bookshop across the river is worth a visit too), and get out to Versailles if you have the time. Why not skip Amsterdam and try Belgium instead? Just a recommendation, but Brussels is the best (and best value) European capital for eating out, all over Belgium the beer is the best in the world, and the people are real nice too. The northern towns are as good as any in Holland if you’re after Dutch/Flemish architecture and paintings (Bruges/Brugge is as big a tourist haunt as Amsterdam, but without the problems- shouldn’t be too busy in Feb.) Whereas Amsterdam is overpriced, the food and beer are crap, (their idea of a beer is 4 gallons of froth on top of 1 fl.oz of lager, for 4-5 euros if you’re lucky) the streets and canals are dirty and full of drug dealers, (and their customers) and it’s nigh impossible to find accommodation. The canal tours are good but the water could well be frozen in February.

Response:

I am planing on being in Europe for two weeks in February.  Does anyone have recomendations on places to see?  I think I want to see Rome, Paris and Amsterdam.  Are there sites along the way I should  definately see of places I should totally avoid? Thanks

Response:

I am planing on being in Europe for two weeks in February.  Does anyone have recomendations on places to see?  I think I want to see Rome, Paris and Amsterdam.  Are there sites along the way I should  definately see of places I should totally avoid?

There’s lots to see in between but since you only have two weeks I would concentrate on those three cities. If you shop around you may be able to find cheap flights between them giving you, effectively, four days in each city — long enough to get a flavour of each place. Travelling by train may be more interesting and may be (though isn’t necessarily) cheaper, but on a two-week schedule will eat severely into your sightseeing time.

Response:

I am planing on being in Europe for two weeks in February.  Does anyone have recomendations on places to see?  I think I want to see Rome, Paris and Amsterdam.  Are there sites along the way I should  definately see of places I should totally avoid? Thanks

Paris could occupy all those two weeks:-) But if you’re pressed, you’d better see the Mona Lisa and all the other major things in the Louvre (give it 1 day and you’ll have seen 1/4 of it if you’re lucky) go up the Eiffel Tower if the queue’s not too long. (I went in Feb and it wasn’t). Then I recommend the underrated Musee de l’Homme, Notre Dame of course (and Shakespeare &co. bookshop across the river is worth a visit too), and get out to Versailles if you have the time. Why not skip Amsterdam and try Belgium instead? Just a recommendation, but Brussels is the best (and best value) European capital for eating out, all over Belgium the beer is the best in the world, and the people are real nice too. The northern towns are as good as any in Holland if you’re after Dutch/Flemish architecture and paintings (Bruges/Brugge is as big a tourist haunt as Amsterdam, but without the problems- shouldn’t be too busy in Feb.) Whereas Amsterdam is overpriced, the food and beer are crap, (their idea of a beer is 4 gallons of froth on top of 1 fl.oz of lager, for 4-5 euros if you’re lucky) the streets and canals are dirty and full of drug dealers, (and their customers) and it’s nigh impossible to find accommodation. The canal tours are good but the water could well be frozen in February.

Response:

Visit to Vietnam, requesting comments

Question:

Maybe a visit to my website gives you a better look. — John http://community.webshots.com/user/johnvanzon/1 – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I am planning to go to Vietnam with my daughter. I was offered the folowing plan. Can someone comment? I live in China so I prefer avoiding more temples, and I wanted a day or two on the beach. Regards, Roni Glimpse of Vietnam (9days/ 8nights) Hanoi – Halong Bay – Ho Chi Minh – Cu Chi – Tay Ninh – Mui ne – Ho Chi Minh Day 1: Arrival – Ha Noi ( Guide) On arrival at Noi Bai Airport, you are met and transferred to hotel. Ha Noi , Vietnam’s capital , is one  thousand year old city with green lakes, French styled buildings, old quarter streets, tree lined boulevards, brightly painted temples and pagodas. ( If time permits) we take a short cyclo ride around  the old quarter streets to see the different local ways of life. O/N at Sofitel Plaza Hanoi hotel*****. Day 2: Ha Noi – Halong ( guide) After breakfast, we enjoy a sightseeing tour of Ha Noi, including HoChi Minh Mausoleum, the One Pillar Pagoda, the Temple of Literature well known as Vietnam’s first university, the Fine Art Museum and the beautiful lake of Hoan Kiem with its sacred temple. In the early afternoon, we make our way to Ha Long Bay with stopover in Hai Phong, the biggest port town of northern Vietnam.O/N at Saigon Halong hotel****.(B)  Day 3: Ha Long – Ha Noi ( guide) Heading out of town, we take a five hour boat trip, which provides a great opportunity to explore the picturesque scenery blending with the sky and some 3,000 limestone islands rising amazingly from the clear and emerald water. Along the way. we will anchor for a leisurely swim in a secluded cove and an enjoyable visit to one beautiful  cave . After a seafoodlunch on board we return to Ha Noi, arriving in time to see an evening performance of Ha Noi’s famous water puppets. O/N at Sofitel Plaza hotel. (B,L) Day 4:Ha Noi- Ho Chi Minh ( guide) There is a free time to relax or further explore Ha Noi. In the late afternoon, we board a short flight south. Ho Chi Minh City is a center of commerce, finance, culture and tourism in Vietnam. This bustling metropolis ,contradiction of its northern counterpart, is crowded with bikes and motorbikes, excited by numerous shopping area and sidewalk caf

Berlin Hotel suggestions?

Question:

Requirements are clean, private bath, quiet, parking, easy access to restaurants & night life.  Required dates are 9/22 – 9/27.  Two singles or one double with separate beds.  Will have rental car. TIA — Integrity is like virginity.  Once you loss it, you are screwed and can never get it back. ZombyWoof

Response:

How about, day 1 try something in Budapest, day 2 something in Vienna, day 3 something in Paris – you get my drift you scrounger (see Zomby’s other post where he says he’s landing in Amsterdam because the flights into Berlin are crowded because there’s an Oktoberfest with 3000 people going! Strewth! Means he’ll have to spend the weekend in Amsterdam and potter down and back to Berlin in a rental car, wasting 2 days business). Which company do you work for Zomby or are you too embarrassed to tell us? —

Response:

Requirements are clean, private bath, quiet, parking, easy access to restaurants & night life.  Required dates are 9/22 – 9/27.  Two singles or one double with separate beds.  Will have rental car.

I’m sorry, can’t help you with a recommendation. Just a note: On Sunday 9/22 is the election for the "Bundestag". So many journalists and reporters for many TV stations will be in the city and occupy many hotels. Bye Mario

Response:

How about, day 1 try something in Budapest, day 2 something in Vienna, day 3 something in Paris – you get my drift you scrounger (see Zomby’s other post where he says he’s landing in Amsterdam because the flights into Berlin are crowded because there’s an Oktoberfest with 3000 people going! Strewth! Means he’ll have to spend the weekend in Amsterdam and potter down and back to Berlin in a rental car, wasting 2 days business). Which company do you work for Zomby or are you too embarrassed to tell us?

Maybe Zomby is not to blame for the "Oktoberfest" but his travel agent. I guess everything was booked (which could well be the case because of the federal elections) and the onliest reason which came into mind of the travel agent for September was "Oktoberfest". Accommodation: will be not easy due the elections try http://www.hrs.com http://www.btm.de/english/unterkunft/index.html Rental car? Train would be cheaper and faster. Even with 2 persons. There are direct IR trains from Amsterdam to Berlin. http://www.ns.nl/internationaal/internationaal.cgi?Internationaal/Lan… steden/Duitsland/Berlijn You can use a Superretour EC/IC ticket if you stay 1 week (must include a Saturday) in Berlin. Price 1st person EUR 138,-, 2nd person EUR 69,- Timetable http://reiseauskunft.bahn.de/english.html A 7-day ticket for public transport is EUR 22,- for Berlin (EUR 28,- Berlin + Potsdam). While Berlin is not the car unfriendliest city in Europe, the public transport network is superb and stops never. Going by car is slower (esp. if you don’t know the city well), and more expensive (parking fees). For a stop between Amsterdam and Berlin the VW Autostadt in Wolfsburg may be an idea. Very interesting. And totally close to the railway station. http://www.autostadt.de As you are in Amsterdam (due to your travel agent ;-) ) I would spent the first days there (if you’ve not been there before). In Berlin you could easily spent the whole week for sightseeing (if you wouldn’t have to work there).

Response:

let us in on their opinion by saying: Requirements are clean, private bath, quiet, parking, easy access to restaurants & night life.  Required dates are 9/22 – 9/27.  Two singles or one double with separate beds.  Will have rental car. I’m sorry, can’t help you with a recommendation. Just a note: On Sunday 9/22 is the election for the "Bundestag". So many journalists and reporters for many TV stations will be in the city and occupy many hotels. Bye Mario

Perhaps that is why I am having such a hard time with flights. — Integrity is like virginity.  Once you loss it, you are screwed and can never get it back. ZombyWoof

Response:

let us in on their opinion by saying: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – How about, day 1 try something in Budapest, day 2 something in Vienna, day 3 something in Paris – you get my drift you scrounger (see Zomby’s other post where he says he’s landing in Amsterdam because the flights into Berlin are crowded because there’s an Oktoberfest with 3000 people going! Strewth! Means he’ll have to spend the weekend in Amsterdam and potter down and back to Berlin in a rental car, wasting 2 days business). Which company do you work for Zomby or are you too embarrassed to tell us? Maybe Zomby is not to blame for the "Oktoberfest" but his travel agent. I guess everything was booked (which could well be the case because of the federal elections) and the onliest reason which came into mind of the travel agent for September was "Oktoberfest". Accommodation: will be not easy due the elections try http://www.hrs.com http://www.btm.de/english/unterkunft/index.html Rental car? Train would be cheaper and faster. Even with 2 persons. There are direct IR trains from Amsterdam to Berlin. http://www.ns.nl/internationaal/internationaal.cgi?Internationaal/Lan… steden/Duitsland/Berlijn You can use a Superretour EC/IC ticket if you stay 1 week (must include a Saturday) in Berlin. Price 1st person EUR 138,-, 2nd person EUR 69,- Timetable http://reiseauskunft.bahn.de/english.html A 7-day ticket for public transport is EUR 22,- for Berlin (EUR 28,- Berlin + Potsdam). While Berlin is not the car unfriendliest city in Europe, the public transport network is superb and stops never. Going by car is slower (esp. if you don’t know the city well), and more expensive (parking fees). For a stop between Amsterdam and Berlin the VW Autostadt in Wolfsburg may be an idea. Very interesting. And totally close to the railway station. http://www.autostadt.de As you are in Amsterdam (due to your travel agent ;-) ) I would spent the first days there (if you’ve not been there before). In Berlin you could easily spent the whole week for sightseeing (if you wouldn’t have to work there).

Thank you very much Martin.  Those are the type of things I was looking for, you have been very helpful.  I was about ready to give up with the other commentary I was getting.   — Integrity is like virginity.  Once you loss it, you are screwed and can never get it back. ZombyWoof

Response:

Requirements are clean, private bath, quiet, parking, easy access to restaurants & night life.  Required dates are 9/22 – 9/27.  Two singles or one double with separate beds.  Will have rental car.

I am sorry that I cannot give you a precise suggestion, but you can find a lot of information concerning accommodation and general tourism at http://www.btm.de/english/unterkunft/index.html Use the button ‘Advanced Search’ to get to a more detailed search form. Check ‘City West’ (preferably ‘Tiergarten’) to find a central hotel. Nightlife and shopping is guaranteed. HTH, R

Would like advice on itinerary / budget

Question:

Like some others have said, keep moving to a minimum. Find a central spot and use it as a base. Moving, while necessary on most trips, is a huge headache. Doug Burke – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

I agree with others.  for an eight week trip try to keep your moves down to 7 or less.  Speaking for myself, a great deal of enjoyment comes from hanging out.  Find a nice sidewalk cafe and sit there and sip beer for a couple of afternoons.  Get into conversations with your neighbors.  Wander around neighborhoods. Find a small park and sit on the bench for an hour or two and read a good book.   There is as much pleasure in getting to know a place in depth as there is in running around to a lot of museums in one town after another. If you have a hobby or special interest, visit clubs or organizations that are related to your interest.   I haven’t heard many good travel stories that Start, " We were in the Louvre one day when….".  But I have heard many that start, "I was wandering down the street in …"  I have a friend with an interest in WW1 Air planes and Aerial combat.  He found a veterans organization in Prague.  He couldn’t buy his own beer for a week.  He was invited to private homes to see photos and models. Look for little specialty museums that appeal to your interest.  With all due respect to the Louvre, Ledo, Tower of London etc.  I can only really enjoy an art museum for about 30-60 min.  Great masterpieces were never intended to be seen crammed together with hundreds of other equally good paintings. On our last trip to Krakow we went to a small Museum at Jagiellonian University, It glimmers in my mind like a perfect jewel,  But what I mainly remember about the Louvre is how much my feet hurt and how crowded it was. We visited a tiny marionette museum in Cesky Krumlov that was more fun and interesting then many larger museums." One October night we were wandering the streets of Mexico, It was 11:00 or so, we noticed a colorful crowd in what seemed to be an old church or meeting hall.  It turned out to be a competition of all the Mexican provinces for Dia de Moertos (sorry if my spelling is wrong) alters.  When they saw us craning our necks they rushed out and dragged us in.  We were the only non-Mexicans there and we were treated like royalty. Slow down, relax, leave lots of unscheduled time, follow your hearts, have a good time. — "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel."  Samuel Johnson Marc

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Like some others have said, keep moving to a minimum. Find a central spot and use it as a base. Moving, while necessary on most trips, is a huge headache. Doug Burke Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

Your itinerary looks pretty good and well paced.  You’re not trying to pack too much in.  If it were me, I’d probably shave a day off of Amsterdam and Luxembourg City each and use them elsewhere.  And Lucerne is nice, definitely a beautiful city, but I don’t think it merits 2 days.  I’d also advise you to make trips outside of the cities.  See the rural areas as much as you can. I also agree with the advice to save Spain for another trip.  At the very least, stick with Barcelona only.  It’s not too far out of the way and definitely worth seeing.  But when you leave there and get to the Provence area in France, keep going east and head into Liguria in Italy, down to the Cinque Terre (some of the most astounding vistas you’ll ever see) into Florence, Venice, and Rome if you can make it that far.  Then I’d route back up from Venice into Austria and then head into Germany.  But that’s just me and everyone has their interests. I tend to be a low budget traveller, so I think under $80 a day is realistic.  The real variable in most people’s budget is their accomodations and how much they go out to eat and drink.  If you keep both of those factors modest, you should be fine. Todd

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

1) Half the number of cities and double the days in each and add one or two small towns anywhere which have no museums. 2) Mark’s suggestions are outstanding and are valid even when you are in your home city. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I agree with others.  for an eight week trip try to keep your moves down to 7 or less.  Speaking for myself, a great deal of enjoyment comes from hanging out.  Find a nice sidewalk cafe and sit there and sip beer for a couple of afternoons.  Get into conversations with your neighbors.  Wander around neighborhoods. Find a small park and sit on the bench for an hour or two and read a good book.   There is as much pleasure in getting to know a place in depth as there is in running around to a lot of museums in one town after another. If you have a hobby or special interest, visit clubs or organizations that are related to your interest.   I haven’t heard many good travel stories that Start, " We were in the Louvre one day when….".  But I have heard many that start, "I was wandering down the street in …"  I have a friend with an interest in WW1 Air planes and Aerial combat.  He found a veterans organization in Prague.  He couldn’t buy his own beer for a week.  He was invited to private homes to see photos and models. Look for little specialty museums that appeal to your interest.  With all due respect to the Louvre, Ledo, Tower of London etc.  I can only really enjoy an art museum for about 30-60 min.  Great masterpieces were never intended to be seen crammed together with hundreds of other equally good paintings. On our last trip to Krakow we went to a small Museum at Jagiellonian University, It glimmers in my mind like a perfect jewel,  But what I mainly remember about the Louvre is how much my feet hurt and how crowded it was. We visited a tiny marionette museum in Cesky Krumlov that was more fun and interesting then many larger museums." One October night we were wandering the streets of Mexico, It was 11:00 or so, we noticed a colorful crowd in what seemed to be an old church or meeting hall.  It turned out to be a competition of all the Mexican provinces for Dia de Moertos (sorry if my spelling is wrong) alters.  When they saw us craning our necks they rushed out and dragged us in.  We were the only non-Mexicans there and we were treated like royalty. Slow down, relax, leave lots of unscheduled time, follow your hearts, have a good time. Marc I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days)

Response:

Hi, <snip Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares.

Over here in NL: Sandwich: 2.50 euro Drinks: 2-3 euro MEal at the MacD.:3.5-4 euro Drinks in a nightclub: 5 euro easy entrance: don’t be surprised at 10 euro simple 2 course and a coffee meal at a cheap place: 15-20 euro 3 course at a slightly more upscale restaurant: 30 euro Hope this helps. — Met vriendelijke groeten/Best regards Jeroen Wijnands http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands http://spam.pagina.nl — "That must be wonderful!  I don’t understand it at all."

Response:

You’ve gotten some good advice from others, especially with regards to getting out in the countryside.  A good strategy is to pick 4-6 central locations and do a lot of day excursions.  It will cut down on overall travel time and help you become more familiar with your surroundings.  Also count on things costing more than you expect, especially if you plan on museums.  Two museums in one day can be close to $20, food can run you $20-$30 in some cities if you’re not very careful and then there is the ice cream and beer!   See below for my comments regarding your itinerary.  Have a good time! Gene Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days)

You could spend more time if you planned extensive day trips.  Try not to miss the Loire Valley or Normandy or take other day trips to Rouen, Auvers Sur Oise, Chartres, Versailes, Chantilly and Senlis, Fontainbleau, etc. Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days)

My advice: forget Spain on this trip.  It takes too long to get in and out of, but as long as you are there, don’t miss Sevilla and Granada or just head there and skip Madrid. Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days)

A good stopover on the way out of Spain, but maybe skip the rest of Spain and just do Barcelona so you don’t waste too much travel time. Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days)

Visit Arles, Avignon if you must do Southern France.  I think instead you should head to Pisa and Florence, maybe Venice if there is time and then to Switzerland.   Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days)

Use Bern or Lucerne as a base and plan to spend 5 days in Switzerland. Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Do as a day trip. Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days)

Yes, Munich!!  Plan on 6-7 days with 3-5 day excursions at least to places like Salzburg, Garmisch, etc. Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days)

Skip Berlin.  Instead, take the Romantik Road bus and then the boat up the Rhine to head for Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days)

Amsterdam is a good base from which to explore Holland.  Maybe 6 days? Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days)

Belgium is small enough to get around you probably don’t need to stay in two different cities. Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days)

Not really worth 3 days when you can spend more time in France!  Try Normandy and see Caen (Bayeux Tapestry), Mont St. Michel or the invasion beaches. This can be a nice relaxing time before your tour is over and you head back to busy Paris. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) That’s a lot of traveling. Sure you won’t get sick of trains and buses by then? Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Sure, no problem. Figure $20-25 for accommodation (less in some places), $2 for breakfast from supermarket (or free with hotel), $5 for lunch, $10 for dinner, $3/beer, and you’ve still got some play. If your tastes tend toward the fancy, of course, this won’t work.

now, if you *do* want to up the beer to dollar ratio, only two words of advice: ‘go east’!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, it’s refreshing to see a trip itinary where there is more than one day spent per country. Your plan looks good to me but for the travel time as has been already mentioned.  Also, I would consider an "open jawed" trip. That means you fly into one place and out of another. We do it all the time and it’s always been AT WORST just nominally more expensive. Usually it doesn’t cost a cent more. Of course we do our homework when it comes to airfare but the payoff is worth it.  For example, if you took the 1.5 days you are in Paris at the end, and sqweezed out another 2 days in the schedule you could take a ferry from Belgium to England and wrap things up in London. That’s just an example You may wish to do something else like put Amsterdam at the end after Brussels, Antwerp and Luxembourg and fly out of Amsterdam and just save the time which means money.  Anyway, hope this helps. Doug Burke Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!)

Why spent all your time in cities?  I’d knock out Lucerne and Munich and Brussels or some three or four stops and enjoy some of the region around Paris or Barcelona or wherever.  Also  I’d bag Germany, Switzerland and Belgium altogether and do some time in Italy. At any rate — a little less travel and grouping some things around particular regional centers might be more interesting.  cities are interesting — but all cities seems a shame when much of the charm of Europe is in the smaller towns and countryside – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days)

That’s a lot of traveling. Sure you won’t get sick of trains and buses by then? Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares.

Sure, no problem. Figure $20-25 for accommodation (less in some places), $2 for breakfast from supermarket (or free with hotel), $5 for lunch, $10 for dinner, $3/beer, and you’ve still got some play. If your tastes tend toward the fancy, of course, this won’t work. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/

Response:

)   Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff   (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do   you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day? under $70/day?   under $60/day? I’m not including the cost of railfares.   Thanks for your help! I doubt that you would manage on much less than $80/day as europe is expensive, especially as the dollar has fallen 10% in value in the past six months.

I stayed in hostels in my last month long trip to Europe.  In London the hostel cost $35 US a nite, in Paris 20US a nite, in Venice, $17US a night.  Breakfast was included at all.  In Sorrento I found a room in a 3 star with no outside window for $27US plus breakfast.  I had a light lunch each day and a nice dinner with wine, albeit not at the most expensive places.  What with admissions to museums and accessing the Internet now and then, and a coffee at a rest stop each day, plus public transportation, I spent between $40 and $75 a day.  Much depends on how you eat and where — sit down dinners with wine are more than fast food, etc.  Wine was quite reasonable in France and Italy with meals — 1/4 carafe of house wine.  If you are going nightclubbing expect to pay and mixed drinks are costly. You should be fine with $80 per day if you go the hostel route and don’t live it up at expensive clubs after dark.  I’m an early to bed and to rise person myself.  Also, I don’t buy souvenirs or film. London was very expensive — had I not spent a week there my average expense would have been less. I did not include city to city rail in the above, although I did include a couple of boat trips in Sorrento, and commuter rail to Pompeii and Ercola.  This trip was in 1999.

Response:

Well, it’s refreshing to see a trip itinary where there is more than one day spent per country. Your plan looks good to me but for the travel time as has been already mentioned.  Also, I would consider an "open jawed" trip. That means you fly into one place and out of another. We do it all the time and it’s always been AT WORST just nominally more expensive. Usually it doesn’t cost a cent more. Of course we do our homework when it comes to airfare but the payoff is worth it.  For example, if you took the 1.5 days you are in Paris at the end, and sqweezed out another 2 days in the schedule you could take a ferry from Belgium to England and wrap things up in London. That’s just an example You may wish to do something else like put Amsterdam at the end after Brussels, Antwerp and Luxembourg and fly out of Amsterdam and just save the time which means money.  Anyway, hope this helps. Doug Burke – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

  Hi,   I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall. I plan on going the   first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8   weeks if my budget will allow it). Here is a rough itinerary that I came   up with. Please let me know if you think the number of days should be   adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.   Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris,   Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!)   Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3   days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days)   Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep   23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29   – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8   (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16   (1.5 days)   Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff   (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do   you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day? under $70/day?   under $60/day? I’m not including the cost of railfares.   Thanks for your help! I doubt that you would manage on much less than $80/day as europe is expensive, especially as the dollar has fallen 10% in value in the past six months. In the itinerary, I would suggest that you skip Spain. It is a long way out of your way – substitute Italy instead, at the very least go to Venice, which is in the north, and try to fit in Rome. There is much more to see in Rome than in Barcelona and Madrid put together. Take a trip out to Ostia Antica, which is an amazing Roman ruined town, and is like Pompeii but easier to get to. On the way down to Rome be sure to visit the Leaning Tower of Pisa. —

Response:

Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!)

Have you figured in traveling time between cities?  Some of the trips will be all day affairs.  You might consider some night trains?  Remember, it takes time after arrival to get into a hotel and "set up" with public transport and such.  If you have a rail pass, you can be as flexible as you like, and if you want to stay longer in a particular place you can adjust as you go along.  With a trip of longer than a month, you may well want to take a vacation from your vacation along the way and have some days here and there without intensive sightseeing or travel. I would prefer more time in the Interlaken area of Switzerland as opposed to Lucerne. Sounds like a great trip, overall.  Just allow yourself flexibility to change your plans along the way to fit your stamina:)

Response:

Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!)

Have you figured in traveling time between cities?  Some of the trips will be all day affairs.  You might consider some night trains?  Remember, it takes time after arrival to get into a hotel and "set up" with public transport and such.  If you have a rail pass, you can be as flexible as you like, and if you want to stay longer in a particular place you can adjust as you go along.  With a trip of longer than a month, you may well want to take a vacation from your vacation along the way and have some days here and there without intensive sightseeing or travel. I would prefer more time in the Interlaken area of Switzerland as opposed to Lucerne. Sounds like a great trip, overall.  Just allow yourself flexibility to change your plans along the way to fit your stamina:)

Response:

  Hi,   I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall. I plan on going the   first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8   weeks if my budget will allow it). Here is a rough itinerary that I came   up with. Please let me know if you think the number of days should be   adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.   Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris,   Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!)   Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3   days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days)   Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep   23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29   – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8   (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16   (1.5 days)   Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff   (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do   you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day? under $70/day?   under $60/day? I’m not including the cost of railfares.   Thanks for your help! I doubt that you would manage on much less than $80/day as europe is expensive, especially as the dollar has fallen 10% in value in the past six months. In the itinerary, I would suggest that you skip Spain. It is a long way out of your way – substitute Italy instead, at the very least go to Venice, which is in the north, and try to fit in Rome. There is much more to see in Rome than in Barcelona and Madrid put together. Take a trip out to Ostia Antica, which is an amazing Roman ruined town, and is like Pompeii but easier to get to. On the way down to Rome be sure to visit the Leaning Tower of Pisa. —

Response:

Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days)

That’s a lot of traveling. Sure you won’t get sick of trains and buses by then? Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares.

Sure, no problem. Figure $20-25 for accommodation (less in some places), $2 for breakfast from supermarket (or free with hotel), $5 for lunch, $10 for dinner, $3/beer, and you’ve still got some play. If your tastes tend toward the fancy, of course, this won’t work. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/

Response:

)   Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff   (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do   you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day? under $70/day?   under $60/day? I’m not including the cost of railfares.   Thanks for your help! I doubt that you would manage on much less than $80/day as europe is expensive, especially as the dollar has fallen 10% in value in the past six months.

I stayed in hostels in my last month long trip to Europe.  In London the hostel cost $35 US a nite, in Paris 20US a nite, in Venice, $17US a night.  Breakfast was included at all.  In Sorrento I found a room in a 3 star with no outside window for $27US plus breakfast.  I had a light lunch each day and a nice dinner with wine, albeit not at the most expensive places.  What with admissions to museums and accessing the Internet now and then, and a coffee at a rest stop each day, plus public transportation, I spent between $40 and $75 a day.  Much depends on how you eat and where — sit down dinners with wine are more than fast food, etc.  Wine was quite reasonable in France and Italy with meals — 1/4 carafe of house wine.  If you are going nightclubbing expect to pay and mixed drinks are costly. You should be fine with $80 per day if you go the hostel route and don’t live it up at expensive clubs after dark.  I’m an early to bed and to rise person myself.  Also, I don’t buy souvenirs or film. London was very expensive — had I not spent a week there my average expense would have been less. I did not include city to city rail in the above, although I did include a couple of boat trips in Sorrento, and commuter rail to Pompeii and Ercola.  This trip was in 1999.

Response:

Well, it’s refreshing to see a trip itinary where there is more than one day spent per country. Your plan looks good to me but for the travel time as has been already mentioned.  Also, I would consider an "open jawed" trip. That means you fly into one place and out of another. We do it all the time and it’s always been AT WORST just nominally more expensive. Usually it doesn’t cost a cent more. Of course we do our homework when it comes to airfare but the payoff is worth it.  For example, if you took the 1.5 days you are in Paris at the end, and sqweezed out another 2 days in the schedule you could take a ferry from Belgium to England and wrap things up in London. That’s just an example You may wish to do something else like put Amsterdam at the end after Brussels, Antwerp and Luxembourg and fly out of Amsterdam and just save the time which means money.  Anyway, hope this helps. Doug Burke – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Well, it’s refreshing to see a trip itinary where there is more than one day spent per country. Your plan looks good to me but for the travel time as has been already mentioned.  Also, I would consider an "open jawed" trip. That means you fly into one place and out of another. We do it all the time and it’s always been AT WORST just nominally more expensive. Usually it doesn’t cost a cent more. Of course we do our homework when it comes to airfare but the payoff is worth it.  For example, if you took the 1.5 days you are in Paris at the end, and sqweezed out another 2 days in the schedule you could take a ferry from Belgium to England and wrap things up in London. That’s just an example You may wish to do something else like put Amsterdam at the end after Brussels, Antwerp and Luxembourg and fly out of Amsterdam and just save the time which means money.  Anyway, hope this helps. Doug Burke Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!)

Why spent all your time in cities?  I’d knock out Lucerne and Munich and Brussels or some three or four stops and enjoy some of the region around Paris or Barcelona or wherever.  Also  I’d bag Germany, Switzerland and Belgium altogether and do some time in Italy. At any rate — a little less travel and grouping some things around particular regional centers might be more interesting.  cities are interesting — but all cities seems a shame when much of the charm of Europe is in the smaller towns and countryside – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) That’s a lot of traveling. Sure you won’t get sick of trains and buses by then? Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Sure, no problem. Figure $20-25 for accommodation (less in some places), $2 for breakfast from supermarket (or free with hotel), $5 for lunch, $10 for dinner, $3/beer, and you’ve still got some play. If your tastes tend toward the fancy, of course, this won’t work.

now, if you *do* want to up the beer to dollar ratio, only two words of advice: ‘go east’!

Response:

You’ve gotten some good advice from others, especially with regards to getting out in the countryside.  A good strategy is to pick 4-6 central locations and do a lot of day excursions.  It will cut down on overall travel time and help you become more familiar with your surroundings.  Also count on things costing more than you expect, especially if you plan on museums.  Two museums in one day can be close to $20, food can run you $20-$30 in some cities if you’re not very careful and then there is the ice cream and beer!   See below for my comments regarding your itinerary.  Have a good time! Gene Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days)

You could spend more time if you planned extensive day trips.  Try not to miss the Loire Valley or Normandy or take other day trips to Rouen, Auvers Sur Oise, Chartres, Versailes, Chantilly and Senlis, Fontainbleau, etc. Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days)

My advice: forget Spain on this trip.  It takes too long to get in and out of, but as long as you are there, don’t miss Sevilla and Granada or just head there and skip Madrid. Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days)

A good stopover on the way out of Spain, but maybe skip the rest of Spain and just do Barcelona so you don’t waste too much travel time. Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days)

Visit Arles, Avignon if you must do Southern France.  I think instead you should head to Pisa and Florence, maybe Venice if there is time and then to Switzerland.   Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days)

Use Bern or Lucerne as a base and plan to spend 5 days in Switzerland. Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Do as a day trip. Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days)

Yes, Munich!!  Plan on 6-7 days with 3-5 day excursions at least to places like Salzburg, Garmisch, etc. Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days)

Skip Berlin.  Instead, take the Romantik Road bus and then the boat up the Rhine to head for Amsterdam. Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days)

Amsterdam is a good base from which to explore Holland.  Maybe 6 days? Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days)

Belgium is small enough to get around you probably don’t need to stay in two different cities. Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days)

Not really worth 3 days when you can spend more time in France!  Try Normandy and see Caen (Bayeux Tapestry), Mont St. Michel or the invasion beaches. This can be a nice relaxing time before your tour is over and you head back to busy Paris. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

Your itinerary looks pretty good and well paced.  You’re not trying to pack too much in.  If it were me, I’d probably shave a day off of Amsterdam and Luxembourg City each and use them elsewhere.  And Lucerne is nice, definitely a beautiful city, but I don’t think it merits 2 days.  I’d also advise you to make trips outside of the cities.  See the rural areas as much as you can. I also agree with the advice to save Spain for another trip.  At the very least, stick with Barcelona only.  It’s not too far out of the way and definitely worth seeing.  But when you leave there and get to the Provence area in France, keep going east and head into Liguria in Italy, down to the Cinque Terre (some of the most astounding vistas you’ll ever see) into Florence, Venice, and Rome if you can make it that far.  Then I’d route back up from Venice into Austria and then head into Germany.  But that’s just me and everyone has their interests. I tend to be a low budget traveller, so I think under $80 a day is realistic.  The real variable in most people’s budget is their accomodations and how much they go out to eat and drink.  If you keep both of those factors modest, you should be fine. Todd

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

Hi, <snip Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares.

Over here in NL: Sandwich: 2.50 euro Drinks: 2-3 euro MEal at the MacD.:3.5-4 euro Drinks in a nightclub: 5 euro easy entrance: don’t be surprised at 10 euro simple 2 course and a coffee meal at a cheap place: 15-20 euro 3 course at a slightly more upscale restaurant: 30 euro Hope this helps. — Met vriendelijke groeten/Best regards Jeroen Wijnands http://www.xs4all.nl/~wijnands http://spam.pagina.nl — "That must be wonderful!  I don’t understand it at all."

Response:

Like some others have said, keep moving to a minimum. Find a central spot and use it as a base. Moving, while necessary on most trips, is a huge headache. Doug Burke – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

I agree with others.  for an eight week trip try to keep your moves down to 7 or less.  Speaking for myself, a great deal of enjoyment comes from hanging out.  Find a nice sidewalk cafe and sit there and sip beer for a couple of afternoons.  Get into conversations with your neighbors.  Wander around neighborhoods. Find a small park and sit on the bench for an hour or two and read a good book.   There is as much pleasure in getting to know a place in depth as there is in running around to a lot of museums in one town after another. If you have a hobby or special interest, visit clubs or organizations that are related to your interest.   I haven’t heard many good travel stories that Start, " We were in the Louvre one day when….".  But I have heard many that start, "I was wandering down the street in …"  I have a friend with an interest in WW1 Air planes and Aerial combat.  He found a veterans organization in Prague.  He couldn’t buy his own beer for a week.  He was invited to private homes to see photos and models. Look for little specialty museums that appeal to your interest.  With all due respect to the Louvre, Ledo, Tower of London etc.  I can only really enjoy an art museum for about 30-60 min.  Great masterpieces were never intended to be seen crammed together with hundreds of other equally good paintings. On our last trip to Krakow we went to a small Museum at Jagiellonian University, It glimmers in my mind like a perfect jewel,  But what I mainly remember about the Louvre is how much my feet hurt and how crowded it was. We visited a tiny marionette museum in Cesky Krumlov that was more fun and interesting then many larger museums." One October night we were wandering the streets of Mexico, It was 11:00 or so, we noticed a colorful crowd in what seemed to be an old church or meeting hall.  It turned out to be a competition of all the Mexican provinces for Dia de Moertos (sorry if my spelling is wrong) alters.  When they saw us craning our necks they rushed out and dragged us in.  We were the only non-Mexicans there and we were treated like royalty. Slow down, relax, leave lots of unscheduled time, follow your hearts, have a good time. — "Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel."  Samuel Johnson Marc

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Like some others have said, keep moving to a minimum. Find a central spot and use it as a base. Moving, while necessary on most trips, is a huge headache. Doug Burke Hi, I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days) Also, if I stay in hostels the whole time, do some touristy stuff (museums, etc), have a few beers, and maybe go to a nightclub or two, do you think it would be possible to spend under $80/day?  under $70/day?  under $60/day?  I’m not including the cost of railfares. Thanks for your help!

Response:

1) Half the number of cities and double the days in each and add one or two small towns anywhere which have no museums. 2) Mark’s suggestions are outstanding and are valid even when you are in your home city. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I agree with others.  for an eight week trip try to keep your moves down to 7 or less.  Speaking for myself, a great deal of enjoyment comes from hanging out.  Find a nice sidewalk cafe and sit there and sip beer for a couple of afternoons.  Get into conversations with your neighbors.  Wander around neighborhoods. Find a small park and sit on the bench for an hour or two and read a good book.   There is as much pleasure in getting to know a place in depth as there is in running around to a lot of museums in one town after another. If you have a hobby or special interest, visit clubs or organizations that are related to your interest.   I haven’t heard many good travel stories that Start, " We were in the Louvre one day when….".  But I have heard many that start, "I was wandering down the street in …"  I have a friend with an interest in WW1 Air planes and Aerial combat.  He found a veterans organization in Prague.  He couldn’t buy his own beer for a week.  He was invited to private homes to see photos and models. Look for little specialty museums that appeal to your interest.  With all due respect to the Louvre, Ledo, Tower of London etc.  I can only really enjoy an art museum for about 30-60 min.  Great masterpieces were never intended to be seen crammed together with hundreds of other equally good paintings. On our last trip to Krakow we went to a small Museum at Jagiellonian University, It glimmers in my mind like a perfect jewel,  But what I mainly remember about the Louvre is how much my feet hurt and how crowded it was. We visited a tiny marionette museum in Cesky Krumlov that was more fun and interesting then many larger museums." One October night we were wandering the streets of Mexico, It was 11:00 or so, we noticed a colorful crowd in what seemed to be an old church or meeting hall.  It turned out to be a competition of all the Mexican provinces for Dia de Moertos (sorry if my spelling is wrong) alters.  When they saw us craning our necks they rushed out and dragged us in.  We were the only non-Mexicans there and we were treated like royalty. Slow down, relax, leave lots of unscheduled time, follow your hearts, have a good time. Marc I’m taking my first trip to Europe this summer/fall.  I plan on going the first week of September, and will stay there for 6 weeks (or possibly 8 weeks if my budget will allow it).  Here is a rough itinerary that I came up with.  Please let me know if you think the number of days should be adjusted and/or if you have suggestions for different cities to visit.  Note that the only cities that I definitely want to go to are Paris, Amsterdam, Antwerp, and probably Munich (for Oktoberfest!) Itinerary: Paris: Sep 5 – Sep 10 (6 days) Madrid: Sep 11 – Sep 13 (3 days) Barcelona: Sep 14 – Sep 16 (3 days) Nice: Sep 17 – Sep 18 (2 days) Lucerne: Sep 19 – Sep 21 (2 days) Interlaken: Sep 22 (1 day) Munich: Sep 23 – Sep 25 (3 days) Berlin: Sep 26 – Sep 28 (3 days) Amsterdam: Sep 29 – Oct 3 (5 days) Brussels: Oct 4 – Oct 5 (2 days) Antwerp: Oct 6 – Oct 8 (3 days) Luxembourg City: Oct 9 – Oct 11 (3 days) Paris: Oct 15 – Oct 16 (1.5 days)

Response:

Hey, I gotta week in Europe – where?

Question:

So many people ask this sort of question

Agreed, but there is no answer. It depends on you. You could stay for a year in Paris, doing day-trips but you still wouldn`t get to see 1% of If you have one week, then I would recommend a rail pass. Just *my* personal suggestion. Bookmark the places you like, then go back, sometime in the future to concentrate on them. If you want to get a feel for Europe, then I would suggest that you see the "other" Europe- that part to the East of the old  Iron Curtain. Just my tuppenceworth! — Regards, Vince Truck Driving In Russia- www.coventon.co.uk

Response:

I do live in the U.S., New York City.  I am retired so have plenty of time.  But I find longer trips cheaper on the whole than frequent short trips because of the plane fare.  I do minimize my expenses by traveling budget style, so can add a week or two without breaking the bank.  I am wiling to trade additional time abroad for a more spartan standard of accomodations and more inexpensive eating out.

Well, if I were fully retired, I’d spend more time there, too – except that, if I were fully retired, I wouldn’t be able to afford to travel!  (It’s that part-time job that makes it possible – I worked a deal with my long-time employer, so rather than "per diem", I’m sixty percent a regular employee, and get sixty percent regular benefits, too.) Obviously we all are different and enjoy different modes of travel. I would feel cheated doing only a week in Europe.  I would not want to come home and would probably pout about it:)  When I do three weeks to a month, I feel I have had a great trip and am ready to return.

My first trip om my own was for a full month, and it was WONDERFUL – but I had so much "banked" overtime, my employer wanted me to use it up, so it was all "paid" vacation time.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week. Maybe it depends upon what you’re going there FOR?  A week is generally time enough to hear the particular opera I’ve come to hear, plus perhaps a concert or two.  If I stay longer, I won’t be able to afford the vacation time for my next project, somewhere else – and theatrical performances don’t arrange themselves to suit my convenience, unfortunately.  I agree with you about the air fare, but I lack the stamina for extended sightseeing, so that doesn’t really matter to me as much as it might have when I was younger and more agile.  If I remember correctly, you do not live in the U.S., do you?  Americans seem to get much less vacation time than Europeans do, so we have to budget our time more carefully, even when we would like to stay longer.

I do live in the U.S., New York City.  I am retired so have plenty of time.  But I find longer trips cheaper on the whole than frequent short trips because of the plane fare.  I do minimize my expenses by traveling budget style, so can add a week or two without breaking the bank.  I am wiling to trade additional time abroad for a more spartan standard of accomodations and more inexpensive eating out. Extended sightseeing is not really what I do — I try to sort of immerse myself in a city and wander about.  I would find daily perusing of "sights" both wearing and tiresome.  I like to have the time to be leisurely and not feel I "must" do this or that on a particular day. Obviously we all are different and enjoy different modes of travel. I would feel cheated doing only a week in Europe.  I would not want to come home and would probably pout about it:)  When I do three weeks to a month, I feel I have had a great trip and am ready to return.

Response:

I hope you’ve planned a stay in Normandy. You musn’t miss the landing beaches, Bayeaux, Honfleur, Mont St Michel www.cpmac.com/normandy.html – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? This sort of vacation planning absolutely stuns me.  What can anyone see hurtling through Europe in a week, particularly if they have to start and end with a 6 or 8-hour air flight?   I wish these short vacationers could get a grip on the notion that being in one place that acts as a hub and radiate out from there is by far the most rewarding vacation.   I’ve done this in Paris and also in Munich.   It’s not so easy in some other cities, because the day trips that one can do are insufficient. Let’s see what the really professional travel advisers have to say? Jaxs

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.  With the internet specials, in the spring and fall it’s often possible to  get there from the east coast for $250 or so. You lose the return day, but  not the arrival day (since most flights arrive in the morning).

And part of the issue is how well one deals with travel and jet lag. Some people can’t sleep on a plane, and cannot practically function on the first day of their arrival.  Which means that (for such people) the "travel time" is effectively two days at the beginning and end of the trip — which means in turn that one week becomes very short. For those who "travel well", on the other hand, one week can be quite practical. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?  Sometimes it’s nicer to break up the months of work with several shorter  trips instead of waiting for one longer one.

When I lived in the U.S., I made several one-week trips to Europe. They were largely confined to one location (eg:  one week in Rome, or five days in Paris and two days in Amsterdam), but a week was sufficient.  Recently I took a one-week trip to California, and that was fine, too. Part of this issue is also just personal preference.  A friend of mine prefers to use the majority of his holiday time taking the entire month of August as a holiday; I prefer to take several shorter holidays spread throughout the year.  Neither way is better or worse in any absolute sense. — hate spam? <http://www.cauce.org            <http://www.byshenk.net/ive.been.spammed.html

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

Funny over the last 2.5 years I’ve taken 5 trips to Europe.  The longest I stayed is 4 days. That was long enough for me. dennis

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.

Maybe it depends upon what you’re going there FOR?  A week is generally time enough to hear the particular opera I’ve come to hear, plus perhaps a concert or two.  If I stay longer, I won’t be able to afford the vacation time for my next project, somewhere else – and theatrical performances don’t arrange themselves to suit my convenience, unfortunately.  I agree with you about the air fare, but I lack the stamina for extended sightseeing, so that doesn’t really matter to me as much as it might have when I was younger and more agile.  If I remember correctly, you do not live in the U.S., do you?  Americans seem to get much less vacation time than Europeans do, so we have to budget our time more carefully, even when we would like to stay longer.

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

I tend to agree. And if not 2 weeks, at least 10 days. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?

There are people who don’t get 2-week vacations from their jobs. Michael To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages only, please!

Response:

Can’t see going to Europe for a week? Living on the East Coast of the US, I routinely do 4 or 5 night trips during the off-season when last minute fares permit. Not every trip to Europe needs to be a multi-week sightseeing extravaganza. Short trips of a week or less are a great way to become acquainted with a new destination or to re-visit an old one.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum? Back in the days when one could fly standby on European trips I would simply go and come home when my money ran out.  Sadly, that is no longer possible (or if it is, I don’t know how to do it.)

Response:

Sometimes the perfect is the enemy of the possible. I think most people on RTE would agree that one week is better than none. IMO, the Eurail pass is horribly expensive – unless you qualify for the youth 2nd class one. But I’d suggest going to just two cities (maybe London and Paris).  In a week you might not even venture outside the city, but that,too, would be missing things. An 8-day week would give you 3 days in London and 3 in Paris, at max. As others have pointed out, you lose the last day since return departures are mid-day.  OK there is a 4:30 pm reutrn to IAD from Paris, but you’d have to be at the airport by 2 pm or so. Do an open-jaw trip, which is usually the average of the prices to the two cities.  Go from London to Paris [or vv] by land, so you see more. Count it as a day of sightseeing.   One of your days in London you might take a tour to Oxford or Cambridge or Canterbury to see something outside the city.  One of your days in Paris you might take a tour of some castles in the Loire valley.   I didn’t see that you had to save pennies.  There are cheaper ways than taking tours, but you won’t see as many "sights".  On my own I did a daytrip from Paris to Reims by rail.  It helps to be able to read signs if you try that. Bob C.

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere

NO. If you have a week, spend it all in Paris, taking one or two day-trips if you really want to. Or spend it all in Rome, taking one or two day trips if you really want to. Or spend it all in Budapest, taking one or two day trips if you really want to. Or spend it in some other city of your choice, similarly. With only a week to spare – and with jetlag killing the first day and travel killing much of the last – you don’t have so much time to spare, so travel less when you’re there and don’t waste time you could use to discover a city by walking all over the place, sightseeing, and generally hanging out. Of course, if you’ve already been to Paris and Rome, it’s possible for you to take a train to some place like Orleans or Naples and spend most of your trip there. The key is that the train trip is 2 hours or less and you’re doing it only twice – there and back. [snip] I wish these short vacationers could get a grip on the notion that being in one place that acts as a hub and radiate out from there is by far the most rewarding vacation.   I’ve done this in Paris and also in Munich.   It’s not so easy in some other cities, because the day trips that one can do are insufficient.

Well, we clearly agree. Let’s see what the really professional travel advisers have to say?

I ain’t no professional travel adviser, but I’m experienced enough to know how I get the most out of travelling. Michael To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages only, please!

Response:

ofcourse 2 weeks is great.  but i’ve actually done 4 day trips to chamonix and had a blast. some people just can’t get 2 weeks.  if you are going for a week and plan on traveling around don’t book the round trip out of the same city.  it is rarely more expensive and it gives you more freedom.

We just finished the following: Fly to Rome Three nights in Rome Train to Florence early AM (on last day in Rome) Rent car (one day), tour Pisa and Florence same day That night, sleeper-train to Paris Two nights in Paris Last day in Paris, sleeper car to Munich Rent car (five days) in Munich Five nights in Munich and Bavaria Fly home from Munich Two weeks, not too much, not too little, four people (parents + 17y.o. + 15y.o.). I can easily see doing 2 or 3 cities in one week.  Won’t see everything, but enough.

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

From California, one week is too short for me considering transit times and time changes.  However, there are usually (off-peak) some good combination airfare/hotel deals for one week in single cities that are very tempting.  I’ve had friends go to both Paris and London on such deals and had a great time at a reasonable expense. Personally, I would confine my intra European travel to the local underground/metro/u-bahn when there. Gordon

Response:

Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?

Yes.  They’re called "Americans."   I’ve done five-day weekends in both London and Berlin and had a great time.  Would I rather take two to four weeks?  Sure, but when there’s a cheap weekend fare and I can’t get much time off from work, it sure beats going up to the Wisconsin Dells for the weekend… — Eric Holeman eholatenteractcom                   Chicago Illinois USA

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days?

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum? Back in the days when one could fly standby on European trips I would simply go and come home when my money ran out.  Sadly, that is no longer possible (or if it is, I don’t know how to do it.)

Response:

ofcourse 2 weeks is great.  but i’ve actually done 4 day trips to chamonix and had a blast. some people just can’t get 2 weeks.  if you are going for a week and plan on traveling around don’t book the round trip out of the same city.  it is rarely more expensive and it gives you more freedom.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum? Back in the days when one could fly standby on European trips I would simply go and come home when my money ran out.  Sadly, that is no longer possible (or if it is, I don’t know how to do it.)

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

With the internet specials, in the spring and fall it’s often possible to get there from the east coast for $250 or so. You lose the return day, but not the arrival day (since most flights arrive in the morning). Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?

Sometimes it’s nicer to break up the months of work with several shorter trips instead of waiting for one longer one. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? This sort of vacation planning absolutely stuns me.  What can anyone see hurtling through Europe in a week, particularly if they have to start and end with a 6 or 8-hour air flight?   I wish these short vacationers could get a grip on the notion that being in one place that acts as a hub and radiate out from there is by far the most rewarding vacation.   I’ve done this in Paris and also in Munich.   It’s not so easy in some other cities, because the day trips that one can do are insufficient. Let’s see what the really professional travel advisers have to say? Jaxs

Response:

Jaxs, in giving his views about spending just a week in Europe ‘running here and there’, could invite some disagreement; such as, getting a ‘bird’s eye view’ and then, later, concentrating on one city and radiating from there. Two additional points: If one only has a week, he could easily spend that week in one large city even without radiating out. More important, regarding radiating out from one city, as he suggests, what he says about Paris and Munich, could also apply to London, Madrid, Rome, Athens, and many metropoloses (?metropoli!). The palest ink is better than the best memory.     –Chinese proverb There is no end to collecting books.    –Book of Ecclesiastes  To three possessions shalt thou look: Acquire a field, a friend, a book.    –Samuel haNagid, Vizier to the King of Granada

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? This sort of vacation planning absolutely stuns me.  What can anyone see hurtling through Europe in a week, particularly if they have to start and end with a 6 or 8-hour air flight?   I wish these short vacationers could get a grip on the notion that being in one place that acts as a hub and radiate out from there is by far the most rewarding vacation.   I’ve done this in Paris and also in Munich.   It’s not so easy in some other cities, because the day trips that one can do are insufficient. Let’s see what the really professional travel advisers have to say? Jaxs

Response:

Jaxs, in giving his views about spending just a week in Europe ‘running here and there’, could invite some disagreement; such as, getting a ‘bird’s eye view’ and then, later, concentrating on one city and radiating from there. Two additional points: If one only has a week, he could easily spend that week in one large city even without radiating out. More important, regarding radiating out from one city, as he suggests, what he says about Paris and Munich, could also apply to London, Madrid, Rome, Athens, and many metropoloses (?metropoli!). The palest ink is better than the best memory.     –Chinese proverb There is no end to collecting books.    –Book of Ecclesiastes  To three possessions shalt thou look: Acquire a field, a friend, a book.    –Samuel haNagid, Vizier to the King of Granada

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days?

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum? Back in the days when one could fly standby on European trips I would simply go and come home when my money ran out.  Sadly, that is no longer possible (or if it is, I don’t know how to do it.)

Response:

ofcourse 2 weeks is great.  but i’ve actually done 4 day trips to chamonix and had a blast. some people just can’t get 2 weeks.  if you are going for a week and plan on traveling around don’t book the round trip out of the same city.  it is rarely more expensive and it gives you more freedom.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum? Back in the days when one could fly standby on European trips I would simply go and come home when my money ran out.  Sadly, that is no longer possible (or if it is, I don’t know how to do it.)

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

With the internet specials, in the spring and fall it’s often possible to get there from the east coast for $250 or so. You lose the return day, but not the arrival day (since most flights arrive in the morning). Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?

Sometimes it’s nicer to break up the months of work with several shorter trips instead of waiting for one longer one. miguel — Hit The Road! Photos and tales from around the world: http://travel.u.nu New mini photo-feature: Life in DC: http://travel.u.nu/dc/

Response:

ofcourse 2 weeks is great.  but i’ve actually done 4 day trips to chamonix and had a blast. some people just can’t get 2 weeks.  if you are going for a week and plan on traveling around don’t book the round trip out of the same city.  it is rarely more expensive and it gives you more freedom.

We just finished the following: Fly to Rome Three nights in Rome Train to Florence early AM (on last day in Rome) Rent car (one day), tour Pisa and Florence same day That night, sleeper-train to Paris Two nights in Paris Last day in Paris, sleeper car to Munich Rent car (five days) in Munich Five nights in Munich and Bavaria Fly home from Munich Two weeks, not too much, not too little, four people (parents + 17y.o. + 15y.o.). I can easily see doing 2 or 3 cities in one week.  Won’t see everything, but enough.

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

From California, one week is too short for me considering transit times and time changes.  However, there are usually (off-peak) some good combination airfare/hotel deals for one week in single cities that are very tempting.  I’ve had friends go to both Paris and London on such deals and had a great time at a reasonable expense. Personally, I would confine my intra European travel to the local underground/metro/u-bahn when there. Gordon

Response:

Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?

Yes.  They’re called "Americans."   I’ve done five-day weekends in both London and Berlin and had a great time.  Would I rather take two to four weeks?  Sure, but when there’s a cheap weekend fare and I can’t get much time off from work, it sure beats going up to the Wisconsin Dells for the weekend… — Eric Holeman eholatenteractcom                   Chicago Illinois USA

Response:

Can’t see going to Europe for a week? Living on the East Coast of the US, I routinely do 4 or 5 night trips during the off-season when last minute fares permit. Not every trip to Europe needs to be a multi-week sightseeing extravaganza. Short trips of a week or less are a great way to become acquainted with a new destination or to re-visit an old one.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum? Back in the days when one could fly standby on European trips I would simply go and come home when my money ran out.  Sadly, that is no longer possible (or if it is, I don’t know how to do it.)

Response:

Sometimes the perfect is the enemy of the possible. I think most people on RTE would agree that one week is better than none. IMO, the Eurail pass is horribly expensive – unless you qualify for the youth 2nd class one. But I’d suggest going to just two cities (maybe London and Paris).  In a week you might not even venture outside the city, but that,too, would be missing things. An 8-day week would give you 3 days in London and 3 in Paris, at max. As others have pointed out, you lose the last day since return departures are mid-day.  OK there is a 4:30 pm reutrn to IAD from Paris, but you’d have to be at the airport by 2 pm or so. Do an open-jaw trip, which is usually the average of the prices to the two cities.  Go from London to Paris [or vv] by land, so you see more. Count it as a day of sightseeing.   One of your days in London you might take a tour to Oxford or Cambridge or Canterbury to see something outside the city.  One of your days in Paris you might take a tour of some castles in the Loire valley.   I didn’t see that you had to save pennies.  There are cheaper ways than taking tours, but you won’t see as many "sights".  On my own I did a daytrip from Paris to Reims by rail.  It helps to be able to read signs if you try that. Bob C.

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere

NO. If you have a week, spend it all in Paris, taking one or two day-trips if you really want to. Or spend it all in Rome, taking one or two day trips if you really want to. Or spend it all in Budapest, taking one or two day trips if you really want to. Or spend it in some other city of your choice, similarly. With only a week to spare – and with jetlag killing the first day and travel killing much of the last – you don’t have so much time to spare, so travel less when you’re there and don’t waste time you could use to discover a city by walking all over the place, sightseeing, and generally hanging out. Of course, if you’ve already been to Paris and Rome, it’s possible for you to take a train to some place like Orleans or Naples and spend most of your trip there. The key is that the train trip is 2 hours or less and you’re doing it only twice – there and back. [snip] I wish these short vacationers could get a grip on the notion that being in one place that acts as a hub and radiate out from there is by far the most rewarding vacation.   I’ve done this in Paris and also in Munich.   It’s not so easy in some other cities, because the day trips that one can do are insufficient.

Well, we clearly agree. Let’s see what the really professional travel advisers have to say?

I ain’t no professional travel adviser, but I’m experienced enough to know how I get the most out of travelling. Michael To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages only, please!

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

I tend to agree. And if not 2 weeks, at least 10 days. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?

There are people who don’t get 2-week vacations from their jobs. Michael To reply by email, please take out the TRASH (so to speak). Personal messages only, please!

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.

Funny over the last 2.5 years I’ve taken 5 trips to Europe.  The longest I stayed is 4 days. That was long enough for me. dennis

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.

Maybe it depends upon what you’re going there FOR?  A week is generally time enough to hear the particular opera I’ve come to hear, plus perhaps a concert or two.  If I stay longer, I won’t be able to afford the vacation time for my next project, somewhere else – and theatrical performances don’t arrange themselves to suit my convenience, unfortunately.  I agree with you about the air fare, but I lack the stamina for extended sightseeing, so that doesn’t really matter to me as much as it might have when I was younger and more agile.  If I remember correctly, you do not live in the U.S., do you?  Americans seem to get much less vacation time than Europeans do, so we have to budget our time more carefully, even when we would like to stay longer.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week. Maybe it depends upon what you’re going there FOR?  A week is generally time enough to hear the particular opera I’ve come to hear, plus perhaps a concert or two.  If I stay longer, I won’t be able to afford the vacation time for my next project, somewhere else – and theatrical performances don’t arrange themselves to suit my convenience, unfortunately.  I agree with you about the air fare, but I lack the stamina for extended sightseeing, so that doesn’t really matter to me as much as it might have when I was younger and more agile.  If I remember correctly, you do not live in the U.S., do you?  Americans seem to get much less vacation time than Europeans do, so we have to budget our time more carefully, even when we would like to stay longer.

I do live in the U.S., New York City.  I am retired so have plenty of time.  But I find longer trips cheaper on the whole than frequent short trips because of the plane fare.  I do minimize my expenses by traveling budget style, so can add a week or two without breaking the bank.  I am wiling to trade additional time abroad for a more spartan standard of accomodations and more inexpensive eating out. Extended sightseeing is not really what I do — I try to sort of immerse myself in a city and wander about.  I would find daily perusing of "sights" both wearing and tiresome.  I like to have the time to be leisurely and not feel I "must" do this or that on a particular day. Obviously we all are different and enjoy different modes of travel. I would feel cheated doing only a week in Europe.  I would not want to come home and would probably pout about it:)  When I do three weeks to a month, I feel I have had a great trip and am ready to return.

Response:

So many people ask this sort of question

Agreed, but there is no answer. It depends on you. You could stay for a year in Paris, doing day-trips but you still wouldn`t get to see 1% of If you have one week, then I would recommend a rail pass. Just *my* personal suggestion. Bookmark the places you like, then go back, sometime in the future to concentrate on them. If you want to get a feel for Europe, then I would suggest that you see the "other" Europe- that part to the East of the old  Iron Curtain. Just my tuppenceworth! — Regards, Vince Truck Driving In Russia- www.coventon.co.uk

Response:

I do live in the U.S., New York City.  I am retired so have plenty of time.  But I find longer trips cheaper on the whole than frequent short trips because of the plane fare.  I do minimize my expenses by traveling budget style, so can add a week or two without breaking the bank.  I am wiling to trade additional time abroad for a more spartan standard of accomodations and more inexpensive eating out.

Well, if I were fully retired, I’d spend more time there, too – except that, if I were fully retired, I wouldn’t be able to afford to travel!  (It’s that part-time job that makes it possible – I worked a deal with my long-time employer, so rather than "per diem", I’m sixty percent a regular employee, and get sixty percent regular benefits, too.) Obviously we all are different and enjoy different modes of travel. I would feel cheated doing only a week in Europe.  I would not want to come home and would probably pout about it:)  When I do three weeks to a month, I feel I have had a great trip and am ready to return.

My first trip om my own was for a full month, and it was WONDERFUL – but I had so much "banked" overtime, my employer wanted me to use it up, so it was all "paid" vacation time.

Response:

Frankly, I can’t see going to Europe for only one week.  Two weeks should be a minimum considering the plane fare, the fact that one loses a day of sightseeing on each end of the flight.  With the internet specials, in the spring and fall it’s often possible to  get there from the east coast for $250 or so. You lose the return day, but  not the arrival day (since most flights arrive in the morning).

And part of the issue is how well one deals with travel and jet lag. Some people can’t sleep on a plane, and cannot practically function on the first day of their arrival.  Which means that (for such people) the "travel time" is effectively two days at the beginning and end of the trip — which means in turn that one week becomes very short. For those who "travel well", on the other hand, one week can be quite practical. Are there really people who just can’t manage two weeks at a minimum?  Sometimes it’s nicer to break up the months of work with several shorter  trips instead of waiting for one longer one.

When I lived in the U.S., I made several one-week trips to Europe. They were largely confined to one location (eg:  one week in Rome, or five days in Paris and two days in Amsterdam), but a week was sufficient.  Recently I took a one-week trip to California, and that was fine, too. Part of this issue is also just personal preference.  A friend of mine prefers to use the majority of his holiday time taking the entire month of August as a holiday; I prefer to take several shorter holidays spread throughout the year.  Neither way is better or worse in any absolute sense. — hate spam? <http://www.cauce.org            <http://www.byshenk.net/ive.been.spammed.html

Response:

I hope you’ve planned a stay in Normandy. You musn’t miss the landing beaches, Bayeaux, Honfleur, Mont St Michel www.cpmac.com/normandy.html – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -So many people ask this sort of question – or something similar, like: For a week in Europe should I plan on a day in Paris, and then a train somewhere and another day or two in some other European city, and then another train to another city for 2 days and then back to Paris for the flight home – or should I aim to get a Eurail pass and go from place to place for 7 days? This sort of vacation planning absolutely stuns me.  What can anyone see hurtling through Europe in a week, particularly if they have to start and end with a 6 or 8-hour air flight?   I wish these short vacationers could get a grip on the notion that being in one place that acts as a hub and radiate out from there is by far the most rewarding vacation.   I’ve done this in Paris and also in Munich.   It’s not so easy in some other cities, because the day trips that one can do are insufficient. Let’s see what the really professional travel advisers have to say? Jaxs

Response:

Alaska, Holland America, June, any hints

Question:

ess expensive shore excursions from dockside vendors than through the vessel.  How is the sightseeing and shopping?

I never book ship excursion and always go direct to the operator.  Very easy to do in Alaska.  Best would be to look over a shore excursion list and narrow down your interests, there are just too many choices.  I recommend you have your plans and any reservations made in advance, time is just too short. Sightseeing is what Alaska is all about!!!!!!

Response:

We are taking our first Holland America cruise,  7 days, Seattle to Seattle, on the new vessel Amsterdam.  We are Seniors and have cruised on Renaissance in the South Pacific before. Any hints about dress code, amenities, shore excursions, etc.  We found on Renaissance that we had better and less expensive shore excursions from dockside vendors than through the vessel.  How is the sightseeing and shopping? Thanks Doc and Rosalie — Visit our web site, www.arholub.com, to get the latest news, computer class information and Orange Coast College marine course information.

Response:

We are taking our first Holland America cruise,  7 days, Seattle to Seattle, on the new vessel Amsterdam.  We are Seniors and have cruised on Renaissance in the South Pacific before. Any hints about dress code, amenities, shore excursions, etc.

I like to follow the dress code.  Tux on formal night, tie and jacket on informal nights, polo shirt and slacks on casual night.  We found on Renaissance that we had better and less expensive shore excursions from dockside vendors than through the vessel.

For local excursions, this is still a good idea.  I would book excursions involving aircraft through the cruise line for several reasons. How is the sightseeing and shopping?

Wonderful sightseeing.  Great shopping is pretty much restricted to native art (and smoked salmon!), but you can really get some good pieces. — Mason Barge "People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like."         — Abraham Lincoln

Response:

We are taking our first Holland America cruise,  7 days, Seattle to Seattle, on the new vessel Amsterdam.  We are Seniors and have cruised on Renaissance in the South Pacific before. Any hints about dress code, amenities, shore excursions, etc.  We found on Renaissance that we had better and less expensive shore excursions from dockside vendors than through the vessel.  How is the sightseeing and shopping? Thanks Doc and Rosalie — Visit our web site, www.arholub.com, to get the latest news, computer class information and Orange Coast College marine course information.

Response:

We are taking our first Holland America cruise,  7 days, Seattle to Seattle, on the new vessel Amsterdam.  We are Seniors and have cruised on Renaissance in the South Pacific before. Any hints about dress code, amenities, shore excursions, etc.

I like to follow the dress code.  Tux on formal night, tie and jacket on informal nights, polo shirt and slacks on casual night.  We found on Renaissance that we had better and less expensive shore excursions from dockside vendors than through the vessel.

For local excursions, this is still a good idea.  I would book excursions involving aircraft through the cruise line for several reasons. How is the sightseeing and shopping?

Wonderful sightseeing.  Great shopping is pretty much restricted to native art (and smoked salmon!), but you can really get some good pieces. — Mason Barge "People who like this sort of thing will find this the sort of thing they like."         — Abraham Lincoln

Response:

ess expensive shore excursions from dockside vendors than through the vessel.  How is the sightseeing and shopping?

I never book ship excursion and always go direct to the operator.  Very easy to do in Alaska.  Best would be to look over a shore excursion list and narrow down your interests, there are just too many choices.  I recommend you have your plans and any reservations made in advance, time is just too short. Sightseeing is what Alaska is all about!!!!!!

Response:

Seabourn extends stays in Northern Europe's premier ports.

Question:

Seabourn extends stays in Northern Europe’s premier ports. Days added in Stockholm, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Hamburg and London The 104 fortunate couples sailing aboard the yacht-like Seabourn Pride this summer will enjoy more time and more options for experiencing the most fascinating ports in Scandinavia, Russia and Northern Europe. Each of the two different 14-day cruise itineraries sailing roundtrip from London on the ultra luxury, all-suite ship will offer generous overnight or multi-day stays in the premier ports of call, allowing for more activities such as sightseeing, cultural pursuits and shopping. New for 2002 is an overnight in the heart of London on the last evening of every cruise, allowing guests to enjoy London’s nightlife, theater and shopping. "Seabourn’s guests consider time a luxury," said Rick Meadows, CTC, Seabourn’s senior vice president of sales and marketing. "These are great cities with a wealth of cultural and historical attractions and superb shopping. Our guests deserve the chance to experience more of what they offer. They can participate in exceptional Signature Series tours, plus our complimentary Exclusively Seabourn experiences and still relax and enjoy these cities at their leisure." Two-week cruises of Europe & St. Petersburg include an additional overnight in Hamburg, Germany and two full days in Stockholm, Sweden, as well as three full days in St. Petersburg, Russia. The cruise also includes a transit of the Kiel Canal through Germany’s pastoral Schleswig-Holstein region and a visit to the medieval towered city of Tallinn, Estonia. In Tallinn, guests will be treated to a complimentary Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experience: a private tour of Peter the Great’s baroque Kadriorg Palace. After touring the palace and its priceless art collection, guests will enjoy a champagne reception featuring a classical music concert by some of Tallinn’s finest musicians in period costume. These cruises depart London on June 1st and 29th, July 27th and August 24th. Three 14-day cruises roundtrip from London to Scandinavia & Majestic Fjords include a day and a half in Copenhagen and two full days in Amsterdam, as well as calls at Leith (for Edinburgh) Scotland; Bergen and Oslo, Norway and Gudvangen and Flaam in breathtaking Sognefjord, Norway’s longest. The London overnight and a transit of Kiel Canal are likewise featured on these cruises. Guests will enjoy an Exclusively Seabourn private visit to Amsterdam’s Historical Museum, well loved by locals but little known to visitors. After riding to the museum in glass-topped canal boats, guests will be escorted through the halls and galleries by curators and guides. Drinks and Dutch treats abound as strolling musicians and singers serenade them. Coffee and tea are served on board the candlelit canal boats during the return. Departures of this itinerary are June 15th, July 13th and August 10th. Extended stays in premier ports are another in a continuing series of refinements being introduced aboard the award-winning Yachts of Seabourn. Elements already introduced include complimentary fine wines and spirits, Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experiences included on every cruise, free mini-massages on deck and popular Movies Under the Stars on deck. Further refinements that have been announced for 2002 include exciting new dinner menus created by renowned chef Charlie Palmer and Seabourn’s Pure Pampering program, featuring fine personal wellbeing products and a selection of soothing and revitalizing bathing experiences by Molton Brown, London. (Source: Seabourn Cruise Line) Eric ISIK Anchors Away Cruise Center Burlingame – CA 1 888 516 6306 http://www.cruiseshipspecailist.com

Response:

Seabourn extends stays in Northern Europe’s premier ports. Days added in Stockholm, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Hamburg and London The 104 fortunate couples sailing aboard the yacht-like Seabourn Pride this summer will enjoy more time and more options for experiencing the most fascinating ports in Scandinavia, Russia and Northern Europe. Each of the two different 14-day cruise itineraries sailing roundtrip from London on the ultra luxury, all-suite ship will offer generous overnight or multi-day stays in the premier ports of call, allowing for more activities such as sightseeing, cultural pursuits and shopping. New for 2002 is an overnight in the heart of London on the last evening of every cruise, allowing guests to enjoy London’s nightlife, theater and shopping. "Seabourn’s guests consider time a luxury," said Rick Meadows, CTC, Seabourn’s senior vice president of sales and marketing. "These are great cities with a wealth of cultural and historical attractions and superb shopping. Our guests deserve the chance to experience more of what they offer. They can participate in exceptional Signature Series tours, plus our complimentary Exclusively Seabourn experiences and still relax and enjoy these cities at their leisure." Two-week cruises of Europe & St. Petersburg include an additional overnight in Hamburg, Germany and two full days in Stockholm, Sweden, as well as three full days in St. Petersburg, Russia. The cruise also includes a transit of the Kiel Canal through Germany’s pastoral Schleswig-Holstein region and a visit to the medieval towered city of Tallinn, Estonia. In Tallinn, guests will be treated to a complimentary Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experience: a private tour of Peter the Great’s baroque Kadriorg Palace. After touring the palace and its priceless art collection, guests will enjoy a champagne reception featuring a classical music concert by some of Tallinn’s finest musicians in period costume. These cruises depart London on June 1st and 29th, July 27th and August 24th. With Early Booking Savings of 40 percent, fares start from $6,563 per person, double occupancy. Three 14-day cruises roundtrip from London to Scandinavia & Majestic Fjords include a day and a half in Copenhagen and two full days in Amsterdam, as well as calls at Leith (for Edinburgh) Scotland; Bergen and Oslo, Norway and Gudvangen and Flaam in breathtaking Sognefjord, Norway’s longest. The London overnight and a transit of Kiel Canal are likewise featured on these cruises. Guests will enjoy an Exclusively Seabourn private visit to Amsterdam’s Historical Museum, well loved by locals but little known to visitors. After riding to the museum in glass-topped canal boats, guests will be escorted through the halls and galleries by curators and guides. Drinks and Dutch treats abound as strolling musicians and singers serenade them. Coffee and tea are served on board the candlelit canal boats during the return. Departures of this itinerary are June 15th, July 13th and August 10th. Taking advantage of Early Booking Savings of 40 percent, fares start from $6,563 per person, double occupancy. Extended stays in premier ports are another in a continuing series of refinements being introduced aboard the award-winning Yachts of Seabourn. Elements already introduced include complimentary fine wines and spirits, Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experiences included on every cruise, free mini-massages on deck and popular Movies Under the Stars on deck. Further refinements that have been announced for 2002 include exciting new dinner menus created by renowned chef Charlie Palmer and Seabourn’s Pure Pampering program, featuring fine personal wellbeing products and a selection of soothing and revitalizing bathing experiences by Molton Brown, London. (Source: Seabourn Cruise Line) Eric ISIK Anchors Away Cruise Center Burlingame – CA 1 888 516 6306 http://www.cruiseshipspecailist.com

Response:

Seabourn extends stays in Northern Europe’s premier ports. Days added in Stockholm, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Hamburg and London The 104 fortunate couples sailing aboard the yacht-like Seabourn Pride this summer will enjoy more time and more options for experiencing the most fascinating ports in Scandinavia, Russia and Northern Europe. Each of the two different 14-day cruise itineraries sailing roundtrip from London on the ultra luxury, all-suite ship will offer generous overnight or multi-day stays in the premier ports of call, allowing for more activities such as sightseeing, cultural pursuits and shopping. New for 2002 is an overnight in the heart of London on the last evening of every cruise, allowing guests to enjoy London’s nightlife, theater and shopping. "Seabourn’s guests consider time a luxury," said Rick Meadows, CTC, Seabourn’s senior vice president of sales and marketing. "These are great cities with a wealth of cultural and historical attractions and superb shopping. Our guests deserve the chance to experience more of what they offer. They can participate in exceptional Signature Series tours, plus our complimentary Exclusively Seabourn experiences and still relax and enjoy these cities at their leisure." Two-week cruises of Europe & St. Petersburg include an additional overnight in Hamburg, Germany and two full days in Stockholm, Sweden, as well as three full days in St. Petersburg, Russia. The cruise also includes a transit of the Kiel Canal through Germany’s pastoral Schleswig-Holstein region and a visit to the medieval towered city of Tallinn, Estonia. In Tallinn, guests will be treated to a complimentary Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experience: a private tour of Peter the Great’s baroque Kadriorg Palace. After touring the palace and its priceless art collection, guests will enjoy a champagne reception featuring a classical music concert by some of Tallinn’s finest musicians in period costume. These cruises depart London on June 1st and 29th, July 27th and August 24th. With Early Booking Savings of 40 percent, fares start from $6,563 per person, double occupancy. Three 14-day cruises roundtrip from London to Scandinavia & Majestic Fjords include a day and a half in Copenhagen and two full days in Amsterdam, as well as calls at Leith (for Edinburgh) Scotland; Bergen and Oslo, Norway and Gudvangen and Flaam in breathtaking Sognefjord, Norway’s longest. The London overnight and a transit of Kiel Canal are likewise featured on these cruises. Guests will enjoy an Exclusively Seabourn private visit to Amsterdam’s Historical Museum, well loved by locals but little known to visitors. After riding to the museum in glass-topped canal boats, guests will be escorted through the halls and galleries by curators and guides. Drinks and Dutch treats abound as strolling musicians and singers serenade them. Coffee and tea are served on board the candlelit canal boats during the return. Departures of this itinerary are June 15th, July 13th and August 10th. Taking advantage of Early Booking Savings of 40 percent, fares start from $6,563 per person, double occupancy. Extended stays in premier ports are another in a continuing series of refinements being introduced aboard the award-winning Yachts of Seabourn. Elements already introduced include complimentary fine wines and spirits, Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experiences included on every cruise, free mini-massages on deck and popular Movies Under the Stars on deck. Further refinements that have been announced for 2002 include exciting new dinner menus created by renowned chef Charlie Palmer and Seabourn’s Pure Pampering program, featuring fine personal wellbeing products and a selection of soothing and revitalizing bathing experiences by Molton Brown, London. (Source: Seabourn Cruise Line) Eric ISIK Anchors Away Cruise Center Burlingame – CA 1 888 516 6306 http://www.cruiseshipspecailist.com

Response:

Seabourn extends stays in Northern Europe’s premier ports. Days added in Stockholm, Copenhagen, Amsterdam, Hamburg and London The 104 fortunate couples sailing aboard the yacht-like Seabourn Pride this summer will enjoy more time and more options for experiencing the most fascinating ports in Scandinavia, Russia and Northern Europe. Each of the two different 14-day cruise itineraries sailing roundtrip from London on the ultra luxury, all-suite ship will offer generous overnight or multi-day stays in the premier ports of call, allowing for more activities such as sightseeing, cultural pursuits and shopping. New for 2002 is an overnight in the heart of London on the last evening of every cruise, allowing guests to enjoy London’s nightlife, theater and shopping. "Seabourn’s guests consider time a luxury," said Rick Meadows, CTC, Seabourn’s senior vice president of sales and marketing. "These are great cities with a wealth of cultural and historical attractions and superb shopping. Our guests deserve the chance to experience more of what they offer. They can participate in exceptional Signature Series tours, plus our complimentary Exclusively Seabourn experiences and still relax and enjoy these cities at their leisure." Two-week cruises of Europe & St. Petersburg include an additional overnight in Hamburg, Germany and two full days in Stockholm, Sweden, as well as three full days in St. Petersburg, Russia. The cruise also includes a transit of the Kiel Canal through Germany’s pastoral Schleswig-Holstein region and a visit to the medieval towered city of Tallinn, Estonia. In Tallinn, guests will be treated to a complimentary Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experience: a private tour of Peter the Great’s baroque Kadriorg Palace. After touring the palace and its priceless art collection, guests will enjoy a champagne reception featuring a classical music concert by some of Tallinn’s finest musicians in period costume. These cruises depart London on June 1st and 29th, July 27th and August 24th. Three 14-day cruises roundtrip from London to Scandinavia & Majestic Fjords include a day and a half in Copenhagen and two full days in Amsterdam, as well as calls at Leith (for Edinburgh) Scotland; Bergen and Oslo, Norway and Gudvangen and Flaam in breathtaking Sognefjord, Norway’s longest. The London overnight and a transit of Kiel Canal are likewise featured on these cruises. Guests will enjoy an Exclusively Seabourn private visit to Amsterdam’s Historical Museum, well loved by locals but little known to visitors. After riding to the museum in glass-topped canal boats, guests will be escorted through the halls and galleries by curators and guides. Drinks and Dutch treats abound as strolling musicians and singers serenade them. Coffee and tea are served on board the candlelit canal boats during the return. Departures of this itinerary are June 15th, July 13th and August 10th. Extended stays in premier ports are another in a continuing series of refinements being introduced aboard the award-winning Yachts of Seabourn. Elements already introduced include complimentary fine wines and spirits, Exclusively Seabourn shoreside experiences included on every cruise, free mini-massages on deck and popular Movies Under the Stars on deck. Further refinements that have been announced for 2002 include exciting new dinner menus created by renowned chef Charlie Palmer and Seabourn’s Pure Pampering program, featuring fine personal wellbeing products and a selection of soothing and revitalizing bathing experiences by Molton Brown, London. (Source: Seabourn Cruise Line) Eric ISIK Anchors Away Cruise Center Burlingame – CA 1 888 516 6306 http://www.cruiseshipspecailist.com

Response:

Long wait in Amsterdam

Question:

We have a 7 hour layover in Amsterdam, so we may as well take a whirlwind tour. What options do I have for travel between the airport and the city? Neil

Response:

There is a desk at the airport where they offer various sightseeing tours for people with layovers, depending on the length of their stay. I tried that once and was quite satisfied. You could leave your luggage in their lockers and groups were small (10 pax maybe). Try them out! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – We have a 7 hour layover in Amsterdam, so we may as well take a whirlwind tour. What options do I have for travel between the airport and the city? Neil

Response:

We have a 7 hour layover in Amsterdam, so we may as well take a whirlwind tour. What options do I have for travel between the airport and the city?

There’s a train station right in Schiphol airport, with frequent trains to the city. The trip takes about 20 minutes. It’s probably cheaper to buy a one-day pass than two single tickets. With a seven-hour wait, I’d definitely go downtown. — Francais / English / Esperanto Esperanto FAQ: http://www.esperanto.net/veb/faq.html Rec.travel.europe FAQ: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/travel/europe/faq

Response:

Just buy a two-way ticket to "Amsterdam Centraal". I’ll cost you 5.20 euro per ticket. I think one leaves about every 10 minutes. When you’re at the station Amsterdam Centraal, exit towards the Dam square. There’s plenty of tourist information along the way. If you want to go to the Red Light District, take a right when you’re on the square. (Which is about a ten minute walk from the station) 4 hours should be more than enough to get a good impression of the city. Have fun! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – We have a 7 hour layover in Amsterdam, so we may as well take a whirlwind tour. What options do I have for travel between the airport and the city? There’s a train station right in Schiphol airport, with frequent trains to the city. The trip takes about 20 minutes. It’s probably cheaper to buy a one-day pass than two single tickets. With a seven-hour wait, I’d definitely go downtown. — Francais / English / Esperanto Esperanto FAQ: http://www.esperanto.net/veb/faq.html Rec.travel.europe FAQ: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/travel/europe/faq

Response:

When you’re at the station Amsterdam Centraal, exit towards the Dam square. There’s plenty of tourist information along the way. If you want to go to the Red Light District, take a right when you’re on the square.

If you want the red light district you go left.  Not right.  Unless you did a 180 degree turn at Dam which you didn’t mention :-) —         — Chris.

Response:

Sorry about that, it was early morning :) Left it is of course, behind the World War II memorial. (Don’t step on the potheads :P ) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – When you’re at the station Amsterdam Centraal, exit towards the Dam square. There’s plenty of tourist information along the way. If you want to go to the Red Light District, take a right when you’re on the square. If you want the red light district you go left.  Not right.  Unless you did a 180 degree turn at Dam which you didn’t mention :-) — — Chris.

Response:

Another idea for a layover at Schiphol: if you don’t fancy goggling at the seamier side of Amsterdam, but prefer something more tranquil and pretty: take the train to Amsterdam Centraal as previously described, then take a canal boat tour of Amsterdam.  Plenty of tour boats operate from just outside the station.  It can be a lovely way of whiling away an hour or two, gliding quietly past all the lovely 17th century canal houses.  (Also, for my taste, I’d always go for a tour boat with a human guide rather than a taped commentary.  Far nicer, far less irritating.) —         — Chris.

Response:

take the train! to the city, do a canalboat tour, stop in a coffeeshop or brown cafe, maybe visit the rijksmuseum.. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – We have a 7 hour layover in Amsterdam, so we may as well take a whirlwind tour. What options do I have for travel between the airport and the city? Neil

Response:

After arriving at Centraal Station from the airport, one of the things I would consider doing is taking the Cirle-tram, line 20, to get a brief overview of the city. Then, back at the Central Station, you could walk to the Red Light District and Dam Square. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – We have a 7 hour layover in Amsterdam, so we may as well take a whirlwind tour. What options do I have for travel between the airport and the city? There’s a train station right in Schiphol airport, with frequent trains to the city. The trip takes about 20 minutes. It’s probably cheaper to buy a one-day pass than two single tickets. With a seven-hour wait, I’d definitely go downtown.

Response:

Baltic Cruise Question

Question:

A group of us are taking the Celebrity cruise next month that leaves from Amsterdam and stops in Arhus, Helsinki, St. Petersburg, Copenhagen, Tallinn and Rostock. There seem to be an abundance of optional ground tours and we’re having trouble making up our mind about which to take. Does anyone have any suggestions. The group’s interests are more sightseeing, shopping and photography than historical. Thanks for the advice.

Response:

Tallinn is worth a day-trip, as it has a nice old town and lots of good restaurants.  The old town is a not-too-long walk from the ferry docks.  Also, visit Kadriorg if you have the chance. St. Petersburg is worth a week.  It would be a serious mistake to pass it by.  It is easily one of the world’s most beautiful cities. Tours to Tsarkoe Selo (aka Catherine Palace or Pushkin), Petergof (aka Petrodvorets or Peterhof), Hermitage, Yusapov Palace, and others, would be worthwhile. Helsinki is worth a day-trip, as many sights are close to the ferry docks.  Kapelli’s is a great place to have lunch, only a short walk from the docks. You might get a better response if you list the available tours. Cliff – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – A group of us are taking the Celebrity cruise next month that leaves from Amsterdam and stops in Arhus, Helsinki, St. Petersburg, Copenhagen, Tallinn and Rostock. There seem to be an abundance of optional ground tours and we’re having trouble making up our mind about which to take. Does anyone have any suggestions. The group’s interests are more sightseeing, shopping and photography than historical. Thanks for the advice.

Response:

A group of us are taking the Celebrity cruise next month that leaves from Amsterdam and stops in Arhus, Helsinki, St. Petersburg, Copenhagen, Tallinn and Rostock. There seem to be an abundance of optional ground tours and we’re having trouble making up our mind about which to take. Does anyone have any suggestions. The group’s interests are more sightseeing, shopping and photography than historical. Thanks for the advice.

Went on a similar itinerary last month, on the NCL Dream. You can take train to Berlin from Rostok, some 2 1/2 hours, I heard lots of complaints from those who went, that was a lot of travelling for a few hours in Berlin and that there was a lot of construction in Berlin at the major sites. Also I heard about one family renting a car and driving to Berlin from Rostok, might consider this, they had to delay the departure of the ship from Warnemunde for 30 mins waiting for these folk to return. We actually docked in Warnemunde, and took the train to Rostok, a Hanseatic   sea port. Walk through the center the main square is quite attractive, and the city hall, and a couple of very old churches. Also take the walk around the city walls on the south side, very pretty gardens. There is a ferry up to Warnemunde from Rostok, which is a small pretty seaside town, I think it is $5.00 each way, or can take the train (very unexciting). There is the molly train, which is a narrow guage railway 20km from Rostok, goes through some interesting villages, not easy to get too, but am sure ship will have tours, the cars are open and would not recommend if raining, windy or cold. Tallin, Estonia, is a pretty medieval town. The ship docks very close to the city center and can easily have a taxi take you to the sites, or alternatively walk. The old town center is very close (5 minutes walk) and can be walked around in 1 hour. A couple of very old churches. There is a tourist office in the square in the center of the old town. You can visit the government offices (5 km from the old town), but cannot comment as did not go. The cost of a taxi (Ford minivan) was $20.00/hr (this is the price for taxi outside of the dock, my understanding is it is a lot higher from taxis at the dock). St. Petersburg, the visa situation is a bit of a pain, you need a letter of sponsorship from a Russian national to get a visa which can be done if contract your own tour in St. Petersburg, and must be done before arrival. Also the port is a working industrial port where ship docks and is 10km from the city center, you have to transit some fairly rundown suburbs to get to the center of town. Anyway the city tour, gives you an overview of St. Petersburg, and recommend seeing the Hermitage museum and the summer palace, St. Peterhof. Next month should be outside the tourist months, so crowds should be a lot better, but when we were there the main tourist sites were very crowded. If you are 4, definitely consider getting a private tour with driver for a day or a 1/2 day, ‘coz the going with a large horde of people gets very tiring. I heard mixed reports about the other large palace, Pushkin. Helsinki is a very compact clean pretty and very convenient city. Nice flea market close to where the ship docks. In Helsinki, Copenhagen and Stockholm there is a tourist bus ($10pp multiple stops) that travels throughout each city and can be picked up by the dock. There is a very pretty shopping area and main square with lots of sidewalk cafe. Arhus, dont know this place, are you stopping in Stockholm??. Gamastein is the old part of Stockholm interesting roaming around and 10 minute walk from the ship. Also visit Vasa museum.       Copenhagen, have to make the obligatory Tivoli garden expedition, I found this to be a big disappointment YMMV. Copenhagen is a very pretty city and also compact and easily navigable, take the tourist bus or a taxi, probaly my favorite place excepting we were limited to 1 morning and 1 evening. I am not a big fan of ship tours, very expensive, and not keen fan of being horded from one site to the next. Not much options in St. Petersburg but definitely unnecessary in the other ports. The ports (excepting St. Petersburg) are all close to the city center. We had excellent weather, hope you have the same and have a great time. Loved the Scandanivian cities, Stockholm, Helsinki and Copenhagen. The trip was much more fun than we were expecting. You might try posting to rec.travel.cruises for lots of active responders. –mikeb

Response:

St. Petersburg, the visa situation is a bit of a pain, you need a letter of sponsorship from a Russian national to get a visa which can be done if contract your own tour in St. Petersburg, and must be done before arrival. Also the port is a working industrial port where ship docks and is 10km from the city center, you have to transit some fairly rundown suburbs to get to the center of town. Anyway the city tour, gives you an overview of St. Petersburg, and recommend seeing the Hermitage museum and the summer palace, St. Peterhof. Next month should be outside the tourist months, so crowds should be a lot better, but when we were there the main tourist sites were very crowded. If you are 4, definitely consider getting a private tour with driver for a day or a 1/2 day, ‘coz the going with a large horde of people gets very tiring.

I understand that visa-free day entry is granted to groups on a booked excursion but don’t know what happens if you want to walk on your own. Regards, ULF — Ulf Kutzner     Backhaushohl 46         D-55128 Mainz

Response:

Helsinki is worth a day-trip, as many sights are close to the ferry docks.  Kapelli’s is a great place to have lunch, only a short walk from the docks.

That depends on the docks. Viking and Siljaa lines dock near Kapelli, but many other dock at the West Harbor. —     *      Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow       *     ******* My typos are intentional copyright traps ******

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – St. Petersburg, the visa situation is a bit of a pain, you need a letter of sponsorship from a Russian national to get a visa which can be done if contract your own tour in St. Petersburg, and must be done before arrival. Also the port is a working industrial port where ship docks and is 10km from the city center, you have to transit some fairly rundown suburbs to get to the center of town. Anyway the city tour, gives you an overview of St. Petersburg, and recommend seeing the Hermitage museum and the summer palace, St. Peterhof. Next month should be outside the tourist months, so crowds should be a lot better, but when we were there the main tourist sites were very crowded. If you are 4, definitely consider getting a private tour with driver for a day or a 1/2 day, ‘coz the going with a large horde of people gets very tiring. I understand that visa-free day entry is granted to groups on a booked excursion but don’t know what happens if you want to walk on your own. Regards, ULF — Ulf Kutzner Backhaushohl 46         D-55128 Mainz

You are given a card to insert in your passport while in St. Petersburg. This is retrieved when you return to the ship. It was not easy to seperate from the tour, they would always count heads when returning to the bus after a stop. I did hear of one couple that went on a morning city tour, seperated from the tour and then met up with a different ballet tour in the evening, there were no problems on returning to the ship. It would definitely have been fun to wander around the center of St. Petersburg unescorted. –mikeb

Response:

Silja and Viking carry the lion’s share of passengers.  But, just for you, I’ll rephrase that.  "Helsinki is worth a day trip, as many sights are close to the Silja and Viking ferry docks, the docks most people use, and the docks most locals will use as a reference.  Kapelli’s is a great place to have lunch and is only a short walk from the aforementioned docks." Cliff – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Helsinki is worth a day-trip, as many sights are close to the ferry docks.  Kapelli’s is a great place to have lunch, only a short walk from the docks. That depends on the docks. Viking and Siljaa lines dock near Kapelli, but many other dock at the West Harbor.

Response:

Silja and Viking carry the lion’s share of passengers.  But, just for you, I’ll rephrase that.  "Helsinki is worth a day trip, as many sights are close to the Silja and Viking ferry docks, the docks most people use, and the docks most locals will use as a reference.  Kapelli’s is a great place to have lunch and is only a short walk from the aforementioned docks."

And just for you I’ll point out that the original poster said he was taking a Celebrity Cruise, and I don’t believe these are on Viking or Silja. Many such cruises use the West Harbor. Kapelli is NOT a short distance from the West Harbor, although if the dock is on the east side of that harbor a tram can probably be easily taken to Kapelli. —     *      Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow       *     ******* My typos are intentional copyright traps ******

Response:

rec.travel.europe with the following: Arhus, dont know this place,